Not many comments in the basic code

Keedon

New Member
Oct 20, 2019
4
0
1
I was just looking at the assembly files for the basic interpreter and I noticed it didn’t seem to have many comments, and the file names are not very descriptive (code1.s, etc). Is there a reason for this, or is it on the roadmap to improve this later?
 

kktos

New Member
Oct 28, 2019
9
6
3
Hi.
That's because it is based on C64 ROM disassembly.
For some comments of the original, you have this : C64Disasm
You'll recognize the name of the guy behind it ;)
 

Keedon

New Member
Oct 20, 2019
4
0
1
Is this likely to be the replaced by another disassembly, or is it worth documenting it with comments?